Jones & Lamson Brownfield Rehabilitation
You may already know the history of the Jones & Lamson building on
Clinton Street in Springfield. You many not know that it sits right
on the banks of the Black River and that it is considered a
brownfield property ~ basically an old industrial site that has some
level of contamination in the soil. On Septmeber 25, 2006, I
attended a public hearing to address the assessment of the site, the
future plans for the site, and how to get from assessment to cleanup
to re-use.
Guiding the presentations and discussion was Bob Flint of the
Springfield Regional Development Corporation, who has been working
diligently for some time to get this property cleaned up and useful
again, with a goal of enhancing Springfield's economy.
Also present were Alan Peterson of the EPA (up from Boston for this
meeting); Trish Coppolino with the VT Department of Environmental
Conservation (she talked about the contaminated property program);
Becky Basch of the Southern Windsor Regional Planning Commission;
Chad Farrell and Rhonda Kay of the Johnson Company of Montpelier,
the company that has assessed the J&L site and is making
recommendations for its cleanup and future use.
Jones & Lamson was established in Springfield in 1888 ~ they
produced everything from wrenches to rifles. In April of 1889,
James Hartness joined J&L as superintendent, and two years later, he
invented the flat turret lathe, "one of the most important machine
tools ever made."
http://www.hartnesshouse.com/hartness-history.shtml
Springfield, Vermont became one of the most important producers of
precision machine tools in the world.
As the global economy shifted in other directions, the J&L building
closed its doors and has fallen into disrepair, ending up on the
growing list of 'brownfields' properties: old industrial sites in
need of cleaning up.
The J&L manufacturing process used cutting oils with PCBs, and the
metals were cleaned and purified using chlorinated solvents. There
are a number of sites that the Johnson Company is concerned with
cleaning up:
~ the chip shed, where metal chips were stored while waiting for
rail transport (they were treated with oils at the chip shed);
~ the solid waste disposal site, out back by the river;
~ solvent storage and heat treatment site;
~ oil storage in an above-ground storage tank (AST).
There is also an underground, off-site source of coal-tar that seems
to be migrating onto the J&L site from across Clinton Street; this
will be looked at in terms of ways to isolate the source and prevent
further migration. The chlorinated solvent has spread out under the
cement pad that the building is on; testing on this pad should begin
in October. Other testing results should be in sometime in late
November, and demolition and removal of contaminated materials could
start in early 2007. All told, the redevelopment plans call for
rehabilitating a third of the building, keeping another third for 5
years and marketing it for redevelopment, and taking down the
remaining third. Whether or not the concrete slab will be removed
will likely depend on whether it is contaminated with PCBs and on
the cost of removal.
There was some technical talk, mostly about the ways in which these
chemicals move and ways in which the site can be rehabilitated. I
asked where the excavated contaminated materials would go, and the
answer is that they will be hauled to a hazmat site that is
permitted to contain it; a lot depends on which chemicals are
present in the materials. Rehabilitation involves putting in place
what they called 'engineering controls': things like an HVAC system
and plastic liner to keep the site safe for future human use as well
as for animals foraging nearby and the river itself.
Reports are available for public review at the SRDC offices (14
Clinton Street in Springfield) and at the Planning Commission
offices (Ascutney Professional Bldg, Route 5 South in Ascutney).
Becky Basch at the Planning Commission would be happy to answer any
questions you might have; if you have more technical questions,
Trish Coppolino at VT DEC can probably help you. Please let me know
if you'd like email addresses for either person.
The state of Vermont is doing water sampling in the Black River
above and below the J&L site; results of those test will be coming
along, probably by the first of the year. There are also monitoring
wells between the building and the river. Among the criteria the
state will be looking for will be the presence of metals.
I met with Jim Kellogg and Steve Fiske of the state's water quality
division last week, to get some practical experience with their
methods, as well as to take another look at the river behind the J&L
property. According to Jim's preliminary findings:
"We have little to
report for chemistry other than the field pH (8.22 @ 18.9 C)
which is typical for a well-buffered stream. We have not
received any results back from the rest of the chemistry. Most
results take about a month to process and report.
There were plenty of
crayfish (Orconectes virilis). It's likely that with the
potential arrival of O. rusticus (Rusty's), the virilis
population would plummet. Again, the presence of crayfish
indicates a well-buffered system."
I'm excited about staying
informed about the process and about being able to observe the
demolition and remediation of the site from a safe distance.
Once the source of a
contaminant is removed, a river tends to 'rebound' pretty
quickly; a well-buffered stream has an awesome capability to
filter and cleanse itself. Although I did ask if volunteers
could be helpful at all, it seems the cleanup would require
special training of certified workers. So, we BRATs can keep
our distance from the hands-on approach for this project! But I
sure look forward to doing our part to help keep the river
clean! There is still plenty of junk to be cleaned up around
the watershed in future RiverSweeps, kayaking trips to enjoy,
and historical sites to visit in recognition of the awesome
power of water and its role in our heritage.
Cheers,
|